http://images.search.yahoo.com/search/images/view?back=http%3A%2F%2Fimages.search.yahoo.com%2Fsearch%2Fimages%3Fp%3Dcoal%2Bpower%2Bplant%26toggle%3D1%26ei%3DUTF-8%26imgsz%3Dlarge%26fr%3Dyfp-t-501%26b%3D61&w=800&h=474&imgurl=www.r-s.com%2Fprojects%2Fimages%2FM8G634_1L.jpg&rurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.r-s.com%2Fprojects%2FM8G634.htm&size=95.5kB&name=M8G634_1L.jpg&p=coal+power+plant&type=jpeg&no=70&tt=416&oid=97e0f1a50a731130&ei=UTF-8
and

http://www.whitneynews.com/Coal_Mine_2.JPG

or

http://www.citizenscampaign.org/images/ocean_wind%20.jpg

Which would you rather have in your back yard? Regardless of cost, or effectiveness. I’m just wondering, because of the amount of people who slam wind power because the windmills are "ugly".

Are they any more ugly than:

http://juicymelons.org/~jono/pics/photos/trains_and_cats/cell%20tower.jpg

and yet these have sprung up all over the country without much controversy.
Gaby: I by no means was suggesting that Wind power would be able to produce all of our energy needs, or that it is predictable. My point was to simply counter the argument that they are "Ugly", and by that logic alone unuseable.

Clearly our energy needs will needed to be met with a one-two punch of a variety of renewable sources and increased conservation.




StumbleUpon It!

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Filed under: Wind Power

Like this post? Subscribe to my RSS feed and get loads more!